Contents | Prev | Next | Index | The JavaTM Virtual Machine Specification |
CHAPTER 7
The Java virtual machine is designed to support the Java programming language. Sun's JDK releases and Java 2 SDK contain both a compiler from source code written in the Java programming language to the instruction set of the Java virtual machine, and a runtime system that implements the Java virtual machine itself. Understanding how one compiler utilizes the Java virtual machine is useful to the prospective compiler writer, as well as to one trying to understand the Java virtual machine itself.
Although this chapter concentrates on compiling source code written in the Java programming language, the Java virtual machine does not assume that the instructions it executes were generated from such code. While there have been a number of efforts aimed at compiling other languages to the Java virtual machine, the current version of the Java virtual machine was not designed to support a wide range of languages. Some languages may be hosted fairly directly by the Java virtual machine. Other languages may be implemented only inefficiently.
Note that the term "compiler" is sometimes used when referring to a translator from the instruction set of a Java virtual machine to the instruction set of a specific CPU. One example of such a translator is a just-in-time (JIT) code generator, which generates platform-specific instructions only after Java virtual machine code has been loaded. This chapter does not address issues associated with code generation, only those associated with compiling source code written in the Java programming language to Java virtual machine instructions.
javac
compiler in Sun's JDK
release 1.0.2 generates for the examples. The Java virtual machine code is written in
the informal "virtual machine assembly language" output by Sun's javap
utility,
distributed with the JDK software and the Java 2 SDK. You can use javap
to generate
additional examples of compiled methods.
The format of the examples should be familiar to anyone who has read assembly code. Each instruction takes the form
The <index> is the index of the opcode of the instruction in the array that contains the bytes of Java virtual machine code for this method. Alternatively, the <index> may be thought of as a byte offset from the beginning of the method. The <opcode> is the mnemonic for the instruction's opcode, and the zero or more <operandN> are the operands of the instruction. The optional <comment> is given in end-of-line comment syntax:<index> <opcode> [<operand1> [<operand2>...]] [<comment>]
Some of the material in the comments is emitted by8 bipush 100 // Pushint
constant100
javap
; the rest is supplied by
the authors. The <index> prefacing each instruction may be used as the target of a
control transfer instruction. For instance, a goto 8 instruction transfers control to the
instruction at index 8. Note that the actual operands of Java virtual machine control
transfer instructions are offsets from the addresses of the opcodes of those instructions;
these operands are displayed by javap
(and are shown in this chapter) as
more easily read offsets into their methods.
We preface an operand representing a runtime constant pool index with a hash sign and follow the instruction by a comment identifying the runtime constant pool item referenced, as in
or10 ldc #1 // Pushfloat
constant100.0
For the purposes of this chapter, we do not worry about specifying details such as operand sizes.9 invokevirtual #4 // MethodExample.addTwo(II)I
The spin
method simply spins around an empty for
loop 100 times:
A compiler might compilevoid spin() {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
; // Loop body is empty
}
}
spin
to
The Java virtual machine is stack-oriented, with most operations taking one or more operands from the operand stack of the Java virtual machine's current frame or pushing results back onto the operand stack. A new frame is created each time a method is invoked, and with it is created a new operand stack and set of local variables for use by that method (see Section 3.6, "Frames"). At any one point of the computation, there are thus likely to be many frames and equally many operand stacks per thread of control, corresponding to many nested method invocations. Only the operand stack in the current frame is active.Methodvoid
spin()
0 iconst_0 // Pushint
constant0
1 istore_1 // Store into local variable 1 (i
=0
) 2 goto 8 // First time through don't increment 5 iinc 1 1 // Increment local variable 1 by 1 (i++
) 8 iload_1 // Push local variable 1 (i
) 9 bipush 100 // Pushint
constant100
11 if_icmplt 5 // Compare and loop if less than (i
<100
) 14 return // Returnvoid
when done
The instruction set of the Java virtual machine distinguishes operand types by using distinct bytecodes for operations on its various data types. The method spin
operates only on values of type int
. The instructions in its compiled code chosen to operate on typed data (iconst_0, istore_1, iinc, iload_1, if_icmplt) are all specialized for type int
.
The two constants in spin
, 0
and 100
, are pushed onto the operand stack using two different instructions. The 0
is pushed using an iconst_0 instruction, one of the family of iconst_<i> instructions. The 100
is pushed using a bipush instruction, which fetches the value it pushes as an immediate operand.
The Java virtual machine frequently takes advantage of the likelihood of certain operands (int
constants -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in the case of the iconst_<i> instructions) by making those operands implicit in the opcode. Because the iconst_0 instruction knows it is going to push an int
0
, iconst_0 does not need to store an operand to tell it what value to push, nor does it need to fetch or decode an operand. Compiling the push of 0
as bipush 0 would have been correct, but would have made the compiled code for spin
one byte longer. A simple virtual machine would have also spent additional time fetching and decoding the explicit operand each time around the loop. Use of implicit operands makes compiled code more compact and efficient.
The int
i
in spin
is stored as Java virtual machine local variable 1. Because most Java virtual machine instructions operate on values popped from the operand stack rather than directly on local variables, instructions that transfer values between local variables and the operand stack are common in code compiled for the Java virtual machine. These operations also have special support in the instruction set. In spin
, values are transferred to and from local variables using the istore_1 and iload_1 instructions, each of which implicitly operates on local variable 1. The istore_1 instruction pops an int
from the operand stack and stores it in local variable 1. The iload_1 instruction pushes the value in local variable 1 onto the operand stack.
The use (and reuse) of local variables is the responsibility of the compiler writer. The specialized load and store instructions should encourage the compiler writer to reuse local variables as much as is feasible. The resulting code is faster, more compact, and uses less space in the frame.
Certain very frequent operations on local variables are catered to specially by the Java virtual machine. The iinc instruction increments the contents of a local variable by a one-byte signed value. The iinc instruction in spin
increments the first local variable (its first operand) by 1 (its second operand). The iinc instruction is very handy when implementing looping constructs.
The for
loop of spin
is accomplished mainly by these instructions:
The bipush instruction pushes the value 100 onto the operand stack as an5 iinc 1 1 // Increment local 1 by 1 (i++
) 8 iload_1 // Push local variable 1 (i
) 9 bipush 100 // Pushint
constant100
11 if_icmplt 5 // Compare and loop if less than (i
<100
)
int
, then
the if_icmplt instruction pops that value off the operand stack and compares it
against i. If the comparison succeeds (the variable i
is less than 100
), control is
transferred to index 5 and the next iteration of the for
loop begins. Otherwise, control
passes to the instruction following the if_icmplt.
If the spin
example had used a data type other than int
for the loop counter, the compiled code would necessarily change to reflect the different data type. For instance, if instead of an int
the spin
example uses a double
, as shown,
the compiled code isvoid dspin() {
double i;
for (i = 0.0; i < 100.0; i++) {
; // Loop body is empty
}
}
The instructions that operate on typed data are now specialized for typeMethodvoid
dspin()
0 dconst_0 // Pushdouble
constant0.0
1 dstore_1 // Store into local variables 1 and 2 2 goto 9 // First time through don't increment 5 dload_1 // Push local variables 1 and 2 6 dconst_1 // Pushdouble
constant1.0
7 dadd // Add; there is no dinc instruction 8 dstore_1 // Store result in local variables 1 and 2 9 dload_1 // Push local variables 1 and 2 10 ldc2_w #4 // Pushdouble
constant100.0
13 dcmpg // There is no if_dcmplt instruction 14 iflt 5 // Compare and loop if less than (i
<100.0
) 17 return // Returnvoid
when done
double
.
(The ldc2_w instruction will be discussed later in this chapter.)
Recall that double
values occupy two local variables, although they are only accessed using the lesser index of the two local variables. This is also the case for values of type long
. Again for example,
becomesdouble doubleLocals(double d1, double d2) {
return d1 + d2;
}
Note that local variables of the local variable pairs used to storeMethoddouble
doubleLocals(double,double)
0 dload_1 // First argument in local variables 1 and 2 1 dload_3 // Second argument in local variables 3 and 4 2 dadd 3 dreturn
double
values in doubleLocals
must never be manipulated individually.The Java virtual machine's opcode size of 1 byte results in its compiled code being very compact. However, 1-byte opcodes also mean that the Java virtual machine instruction set must stay small. As a compromise, the Java virtual machine does not provide equal support for all data types: it is not completely orthogonal (see Table 3.2, "Type support in the Java virtual machine instruction set").
For example, the comparison of values of type int
in the for
statement of example spin
can be implemented using a single if_icmplt instruction; however, there is no single instruction in the Java virtual machine instruction set that performs a conditional branch on values of type double
. Thus, dspin
must implement its comparison of values of type double
using a dcmpg instruction followed by an iflt instruction.
The Java virtual machine provides the most direct support for data of type int
. This is partly in anticipation of efficient implementations of the Java virtual machine's operand stacks and local variable arrays. It is also motivated by the frequency of int
data in typical programs. Other integral types have less direct support. There are no byte
, char
, or short
versions of the store, load, or add instructions, for instance. Here is the spin
example written using a short
:
It must be compiled for the Java virtual machine, as follows, using instructions operating on another type, most likelyvoid sspin() {
short i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
; // Loop body is empty
}
}
int
, converting between short
and int
values as necessary to ensure that the results of operations on short
data stay
within the appropriate range:
The lack of direct support forMethodvoid
sspin()
0 iconst_0 1 istore_1 2 goto 10 5 iload_1 // Theshort
is treated as though anint
6 iconst_1 7 iadd 8 i2s // Truncateint
toshort
9 istore_1 10 iload_1 11 bipush 100 13 if_icmplt 5 16 return
byte
, char
, and short
types in the Java virtual
machine is not particularly painful, because values of those types are internally promoted
to int
(byte
and short
are sign-extended to int
, char
is zero-extended).
Operations on byte
, char
, and short
data can thus be done using int
instructions.
The only additional cost is that of truncating the values of int
operations to valid
ranges.
The long
and floating-point types have an intermediate level of support in the Java virtual machine, lacking only the full complement of conditional control transfer instructions.
align2grain
method aligns an int
value to a given power
of 2:
Operands for arithmetic operations are popped from the operand stack, and the results of operations are pushed back onto the operand stack. Results of arithmetic subcomputations can thus be made available as operands of their nesting computation. For instance, the calculation ofint align2grain(int i, int grain) {
return ((i + grain-1) & ~(grain-1));
}
~(grain
-1)
is handled by these instructions:
First5 iload_2 // Pushgrain
6 iconst_1 // Pushint
constant1
7 isub // Subtract; push result 8 iconst_m1 // Pushint
constant -1
9 ixor // Do XOR; push result
grain
- 1
is calculated using the contents of local variable 2 and an immediate
int
value 1
. These operands are popped from the operand stack and their
difference pushed back onto the operand stack. The difference is thus immediately
available for use as one operand of the ixor instruction. (Recall that ~x
==
-1^x
.) Similarly, the result of the ixor instruction becomes an operand for the
subsequent iand instruction.
The code for the entire method follows:
Methodint
align2grain(int,int)
0 iload_1 1 iload_2 2 iadd 3 iconst_1 4 isub 5 iload_2 6 iconst_1 7 isub 8 iconst_m1 9 ixor 10 iand 11 ireturn
int
, long
, float
, and double
, as well as references to
instances of class String
, are managed using the ldc, ldc_w, and ldc2_w instructions.
The ldc and ldc_w instructions are used to access values in the runtime constant pool (including instances of class String
) of types other than double
and long
. The ldc_w instruction is used in place of ldc only when there is a large number of runtime constant pool items and a larger index is needed to access an item. The ldc2_w instruction is used to access all values of types double
and long
; there is no non-wide variant.
Integral constants of types byte
, char
, or short
, as well as small int
values, may be compiled using the bipush, sipush, or iconst_<i> instructions, as seen earlier (§7.2). Certain small floating-point constants may be compiled using the fconst_<f> and dconst_<d> instructions.
In all of these cases, compilation is straightforward. For instance, the constants for
are set up as follows:void useManyNumeric() {
int i = 100;
int j = 1000000;
long l1 = 1;
long l2 = 0xffffffff;
double d = 2.2;
...do some calculations...
}
Methodvoid
useManyNumeric()
0 bipush 100 // Push a smallint
with bipush 2 istore_1 3 ldc #1 // Pushint
constant1000000
; a largerint
// value uses ldc 5 istore_2 6 lconst_1 // A tinylong
value uses short, fast lconst_1 7 lstore_3 8 ldc2_w #6 // Pushlong
0xffffffff
(that is, anint
-1
); any //long
constant value can be pushed using ldc2_w 11 lstore 5 13 ldc2_w #8 // Pushdouble
constant2.200000
; uncommon //double
values are also pushed using ldc2_w 16 dstore 7 ...do those calculations...
for
statements was shown in an earlier section (§7.2). Most of the Java
programming language's other control constructs (if-then-else
, do
, while
,
break
, and continue
) are also compiled in the obvious ways. The compilation of
switch
statements is handled in a separate section (Section 7.10, "Compiling
Switches"), as are the compilation of exceptions (Section 7.12, "Throwing and Handling
Exceptions") and the compilation of finally
clauses (Section 7.13, "Compiling
finally
").
As a further example, a while
loop is compiled in an obvious way, although the specific control transfer instructions made available by the Java virtual machine vary by data type. As usual, there is more support for data of type int
, for example:
is compiled tovoid whileInt() {
int i = 0;
while (i < 100) {
i++;
}
}
Note that the test of theMethodvoid
whileInt()
0 iconst_0 1 istore_1 2 goto 8 5 iinc 1 1 8 iload_1 9 bipush 100 11 if_icmplt 5 14 return
while
statement (implemented using the if_icmplt instruction) is at the bottom of the Java virtual machine code for the loop. (This was also the case in the spin
examples earlier.) The test being at the bottom of the loop forces the use of a goto instruction to get to the test prior to the first iteration of the loop. If that test fails, and the loop body is never entered, this extra instruction is wasted. However, while
loops are typically used when their body is expected to be run, often for many iterations. For subsequent iterations, putting the test at the bottom of the loop saves a Java virtual machine instruction each time around the loop: if the test were at the top of the loop, the loop body would need a trailing goto instruction to get back to the top.Control constructs involving other data types are compiled in similar ways, but must use the instructions available for those data types. This leads to somewhat less efficient code because more Java virtual machine instructions are needed, for example:
is compiled tovoid whileDouble() {
double i = 0.0;
while (i < 100.1) {
i++;
}
}
Each floating-point type has two comparison instructions: fcmpl and fcmpg for typeMethodvoid
whileDouble()
0 dconst_0 1 dstore_1 2 goto 9 5 dload_1 6 dconst_1 7 dadd 8 dstore_1 9 dload_1 10 ldc2_w #4 // Pushdouble
constant100.1
13 dcmpg // To do the compare and branch we have to use... 14 iflt 5 // ...two instructions 17 return
float
, and dcmpl and dcmpg for type double
. The variants differ only in their treatment of NaN. NaN is unordered, so all floating-point comparisons fail if either of their operands is NaN. The compiler chooses the variant of the comparison instruction for the appropriate type that produces the same result whether the comparison fails on non-NaN values or encounters a NaN.
compiles toint lessThan100(double d) {
if (d < 100.0) {
return 1;
} else {
return -1;
}
}
IfMethodint
lessThan100(double)
0 dload_1 1 ldc2_w #4 // Pushdouble
constant100.0
4 dcmpg // Push 1 ifd
is NaN ord
\>100.0
; // push 0 ifd
==100.0
5 ifge 10 // Branch on 0 or 1 8 iconst_1 9 ireturn 10 iconst_m1 11 ireturn
d
is not NaN and is less than 100.0
, the dcmpg instruction pushes an int
-1 onto
the operand stack, and the ifge instruction does not branch. Whether d
is greater than
100.0
or is NaN, the dcmpg instruction pushes an int
1 onto the operand stack,
and the ifge branches. If d
is equal to 100.0
, the dcmpg instruction pushes an int
0
onto the operand stack, and the ifge branches.
The dcmpl instruction achieves the same effect if the comparison is reversed:
becomesint greaterThan100(double d) {
if (d > 100.0) {
return 1;
} else {
return -1;
}
}
Once again, whether the comparison fails on a non-NaN value or because it is passed a NaN, the dcmpl instruction pushes anMethodint
greaterThan100(double)
0 dload_1 1 ldc2_w #4 // Pushdouble
constant100.0
4 dcmpl // Push -1 ifd
is Nan ord
<100.0
; // push 0 ifd
==100.0
5 ifle 10 // Branch on 0 or -1 8 iconst_1 9 ireturn 10 iconst_m1 11 ireturn
int
value onto the operand stack
that causes the ifle to branch. If both of the dcmp instructions did not exist, one of
the example methods would have had to do more work to detect NaN.
compiles toint addTwo(int i, int j) {
return i + j;
}
By convention, an instance method is passed aMethodint
addTwo(int,int)
0 iload_1 // Push value of local variable 1 (i
) 1 iload_2 // Push value of local variable 2 (j
) 2 iadd // Add; leaveint
result on operand stack 3 ireturn // Returnint
result
reference
to its instance in local variable 0. In the Java programming language the instance is accessible via the this
keyword.
Class (static
) methods do not have an instance, so for them this use of local variable zero is unnecessary. A class method starts using local variables at index zero. If the addTwo
method were a class method, its arguments would be passed in a similar way to the first version:
compiles tostatic int addTwoStatic(int i, int j) {
return i + j;
}
The only difference is that the method arguments appear starting in local variable 0 rather than 1.Methodint
addTwoStatic(int,int)
0 iload_0 1 iload_1 2 iadd 3 ireturn
addTwo
method, defined earlier as an instance method, we might write
This compiles toint add12and13() {
return addTwo(12, 13);
}
The invocation is set up by first pushing aMethodint
add12and13()
0 aload_0 // Push local variable 0 (this
) 1 bipush 12 // Pushint
constant12
3 bipush 13 // Pushint
constant13
5 invokevirtual #4 // MethodExample.addtwo(II)I
8 ireturn // Returnint
on top of operand stack; it is // theint
result ofaddTwo()
reference
to the current instance, this
, onto the operand stack. The method invocation's arguments, int
values 12
and 13
, are then pushed. When the frame for the addTwo
method is created, the arguments passed to the method become the initial values of the new frame's local variables. That is, the reference
for this
and the two arguments, pushed onto the operand stack by the invoker, will become the initial values of local variables 0, 1, and 2 of the invoked method.
Finally, addTwo
is invoked. When it returns, its int
return value is pushed onto the operand stack of the frame of the invoker, the add12and13
method. The return value is thus put in place to be immediately returned to the invoker of add12and13
.
The return from add12and13
is handled by the ireturn instruction of add12and13
. The ireturn instruction takes the int
value returned by addTwo
, on the operand stack of the current frame, and pushes it onto the operand stack of the frame of the invoker. It then returns control to the invoker, making the invoker's frame current. The Java virtual machine provides distinct return instructions for many of its numeric and reference
data types, as well as a return instruction for methods with no return value. The same set of return instructions is used for all varieties of method invocations.
The operand of the invokevirtual instruction (in the example, the runtime constant pool index #4) is not the offset of the method in the class instance. The compiler does not know the internal layout of a class instance. Instead, it generates symbolic references to the methods of an instance, which are stored in the runtime constant pool. Those runtime constant pool items are resolved at run time to determine the actual method location. The same is true for all other Java virtual machine instructions that access class instances.
Invoking addTwoStatic
, a class (static
) variant of addTwo
, is similar, as shown:
although a different Java virtual machine method invocation instruction is used:int add12and13() {
return addTwoStatic(12, 13);
}
Compiling an invocation of a class (Methodint add12and13()
0 bipush 12 2 bipush 13 4 invokestatic #3 // MethodExample.addTwoStatic(II)I
7 ireturn
static
) method is very much like compiling an
invocation of an instance method, except this
is not passed by the invoker. The
method arguments will thus be received beginning with local variable 0 (see Section
7.6, "Receiving Arguments"). The invokestatic instruction is always used to invoke
class methods.
The invokespecial instruction must be used to invoke instance initialization methods (see Section 7.8, "Working with Class Instances"). It is also used when invoking methods in the superclass (super
) and when invoking private
methods. For instance, given classes Near
and Far
declared as
the methodclass Near {
int it;
public int getItNear() {
return getIt();
}
private int getIt() {
return it;
}
}class Far extends Near {
int getItFar() {
return super.getItNear();
}
}
Near.getItNear
(which invokes a private
method) becomes
The methodMethodint
getItNear()
0 aload_0 1 invokespecial #5 // MethodNear.getIt()I
4 ireturn
Far.getItFar
(which invokes a superclass method) becomes
Note that methods called using the invokespecial instruction always passMethodint
getItFar()
0 aload_0 1 invokespecial #4 // MethodNear.getItNear()I
4 ireturn
this
to
the invoked method as its first argument. As usual, it is received in local variable 0.
<init>
. This specially
named method is known as the instance initialization method (§3.9). Multiple
instance initialization methods, corresponding to multiple constructors, may exist
for a given class. Once the class instance has been created and its instance variables,
including those of the class and all of its superclasses, have been initialized to their
default values, an instance initialization method of the new class instance is invoked.
For example:
compiles toObject create() {
return new Object();
}
Class instances are passed and returned (asMethodjava.lang.Object
create()
0 new #1 // Classjava.lang.Object
3 dup 4 invokespecial #4 // Methodjava.lang.Object.<init>()V
7 areturn
reference
types) very much like numeric values, although type reference
has its own complement of instructions, for example:
becomesint i; // An instance variable
MyObj example() {
MyObj o = new MyObj();
return silly(o);
}
MyObj silly(MyObj o) {
if (o != null) {
return o;
} else {
return o;
}
}
The fields of a class instance (instance variables) are accessed using the getfield and putfield instructions. IfMethodMyObj
example()
0 new #2 // ClassMyObj
3 dup 4 invokespecial #5 // MethodMyObj.<init>()V
7 astore_1 8 aload_0 9 aload_1 10 invokevirtual #4 // MethodExample.silly(LMyObj;)LMyObj;
13 areturn MethodMyObj
silly(MyObj)
0 aload_1 1 ifnull 6 4 aload_1 5 areturn 6 aload_1 7 areturn
i
is an instance variable of type int
, the methods setIt
and getIt,
defined as
becomevoid setIt(int value) {
i = value;
}
int getIt() {
return i;
}
As with the operands of method invocation instructions, the operands of the putfield and getfield instructions (the runtime constant pool index #4) are not the offsets of the fields in the class instance. The compiler generates symbolic references to the fields of an instance, which are stored in the runtime constant pool. Those runtime constant pool items are resolved at run time to determine the location of the field within the referenced object.Methodvoid
setIt(int)
0 aload_0 1 iload_1 2 putfield #4 // FieldExample.i I
5 return Methodint
getIt()
0 aload_0 1 getfield #4 // FieldExample.i I
4 ireturn
might be compiled tovoid createBuffer() {
int buffer[];
int bufsz = 100;
int value = 12;
buffer = new int[bufsz];
buffer[10] = value;
value = buffer[11];
}
The anewarray instruction is used to create a one-dimensional array of object references, for example:Methodvoid
createBuffer()
0 bipush 100 // Pushint
constant 100 (bufsz
) 2 istore_2 // Storebufsz
in local variable 2 3 bipush 12 // Pushint
constant 12 (value
) 5 istore_3 // Storevalue
in local variable 3 6 iload_2 // Pushbufsz
... 7 newarrayint
// ...and create new array ofint
of that length 9 astore_1 // Store new array inbuffer
10 aload_1 // Pushbuffer
11 bipush 10 // Pushint
constant10
13 iload_3 // Pushvalue
14 iastore // Store value atbuffer[10]
15 aload_1 // Pushbuffer
16 bipush 11 // Pushint
constant11
18 iaload // Push value atbuffer[11]
... 19 istore_3 // ...and store it invalue
20 return
becomesvoid createThreadArray() {
Thread threads[];
int count = 10;
threads = new Thread[count];
threads[0] = new Thread();
}
The anewarray instruction can also be used to create the first dimension of a multidimensional array. Alternatively, the multianewarray instruction can be used to create several dimensions at once. For example, the three-dimensional array:Methodvoid createThreadArray()
0 bipush 10 // Pushint
constant10
2 istore_2 // Initializecount
to that 3 iload_2 // Pushcount
, used by anewarray 4 anewarray class #1 // Create new array of classThread
7 astore_1 // Store new array inthreads
8 aload_1 // Push value ofthreads
9 iconst_0 // Pushint
constant0
10 new #1 // Create instance of classThread
13 dup // Make duplicate reference... 14 invokespecial #5 // ...to pass to instance initialization method // Methodjava.lang.Thread.<init>()V
17 aastore // Store newThread
in array at0
18 return
is created byint[][][] create3DArray() {
int grid[][][];
grid = new int[10][5][];
return grid;
}
The first operand of the multianewarray instruction is the runtime constant pool index to the array class type to be created. The second is the number of dimensions of that array type to actually create. The multianewarray instruction can be used to create all the dimensions of the type, as the code forMethodint
create3DArray()[][][]
0 bipush 10 // Pushint
10
(dimension one) 2 iconst_5 // Pushint
5
(dimension two) 3 multianewarray #1 dim #2 // Class[[[I
, a three // dimensionalint
array; // only create first two // dimensions 7 astore_1 // Store new array... 8 aload_1 // ...then prepare to return it 9 areturn
create3DArray
shows. Note that the multidimensional
array is just an object and so is loaded and returned by an aload_1 and
areturn instruction, respectively. For information about array class names, see Section
4.4.1.
All arrays have associated lengths, which are accessed via the arraylength instruction.
switch
statements uses the tableswitch and lookupswitch instructions.
The tableswitch instruction is used when the cases of the switch
can be efficiently
represented as indices into a table of target offsets. The default
target of
the switch
is used if the value of the expression of the switch
falls outside the
range of valid indices. For instance,
compiles toint chooseNear(int i) {
switch (i) {
case 0: return 0;
case 1: return 1;
case 2: return 2;
default: return -1;
}
}
The Java virtual machine's tableswitch and lookupswitch instructions operate only onMethodint
chooseNear(int)
0 iload_1 // Push local variable 1 (argumenti
) 1 tableswitch 0 to 2: // Valid indices are 0 through 2 0: 28 // Ifi
is0
, continue at 28 1: 30 // Ifi
is1
, continue at 30 2: 32 // Ifi
is2
, continue at 32 default:34 // Otherwise, continue at 34 28 iconst_0 //i
was0
; pushint
constant0
... 29 ireturn // ...and return it 30 iconst_1 //i
was1
; pushint
constant1
... 31 ireturn // ...and return it 32 iconst_2 //i
was2
; pushint
constant2
... 33 ireturn // ...and return it 34 iconst_m1 // otherwise pushint
constant -1
... 35 ireturn // ...and return it
int
data. Because operations on byte
, char
, or short
values are internally promoted to int
, a switch
whose expression evaluates to one of those types is compiled as though it evaluated to type int
. If the chooseNear
method had been written using type short
, the same Java virtual machine instructions would have been generated as when using type int
. Other numeric types must be narrowed to type int
for use in a switch
.
Where the cases of the switch
are sparse, the table representation of the tableswitch instruction becomes inefficient in terms of space. The lookupswitch instruction may be used instead. The lookupswitch instruction pairs int
keys (the values of the case
labels) with target offsets in a table. When a lookupswitch instruction is executed, the value of the expression of the switch
is compared against the keys in the table. If one of the keys matches the value of the expression, execution continues at the associated target offset. If no key matches, execution continues at the default
target. For instance, the compiled code for
looks just like the code forint chooseFar(int i) {
switch (i) {
case -100: return -1;
case 0: return 0;
case 100: return 1;
default: return -1;
}
}
chooseNear
, except for the use of the lookupswitch
instruction:
The Java virtual machine specifies that the table of the lookupswitch instruction must be sorted by key so that implementations may use searches more efficient than a linear scan. Even so, the lookupswitch instruction must search its keys for a match rather than simply perform a bounds check and index into a table like tableswitch. Thus, a tableswitch instruction is probably more efficient than a lookupswitch where space considerations permit a choice.Methodint
chooseFar(int)
0 iload_1 1 lookupswitch 3: -100: 36 0: 38 100: 40 default:42 36 iconst_m1 37 ireturn 38 iconst_0 39 ireturn 40 iconst_1 41 ireturn 42 iconst_m1 43 ireturn
is compiled topublic long nextIndex() {
return index++;
}
private long index = 0;
Note that the Java virtual machine never allows its operand stack manipulation instructions to modify or break up individual values on the operand stack.Methodlong nextIndex()
0 aload_0 // Pushthis
1 dup // Make a copy of it 2 getfield #4 // One of the copies ofthis
is consumed // pushinglong
fieldindex
, // above the originalthis
5 dup2_x1 // Thelong
on top of the operand stack is // inserted into the operand stack below the // originalthis
6 lconst_1 // Pushlong
constant 1 7 ladd // The index value is incremented... 8 putfield #4 // ...and the result stored back in the field 11 lreturn // The original value ofindex
is left on // top of the operand stack, ready to be returned
throw
keyword. Its compilation is
simple:
becomesvoid cantBeZero(int i) throws TestExc {
if (i == 0) {
throw new TestExc();
}
}
Compilation ofMethodvoid
cantBeZero(int)
0 iload_1 // Push argument 1 (i
) 1 ifne 12 // Ifi==0
, allocate instance and throw 4 new #1 // Create instance ofTestExc
7 dup // One reference goes to the constructor 8 invokespecial #7 // MethodTestExc.<init>()V
11 athrow // Second reference is thrown 12 return // Never get here if we threwTestExc
try
-catch
constructs is straightforward. For example,
is compiled asvoid catchOne() {
try {
tryItOut();
} catch (TestExc e) {
handleExc(e);
}
}
Looking more closely, theMethodvoid
catchOne()
0 aload_0 // Beginning oftry
block 1 invokevirtual #6 // MethodExample.tryItOut()V
4 return // End oftry
block; normal return 5 astore_1 // Store thrown value in local variable 1 6 aload_0 // Pushthis
7 aload_1 // Push thrown value 8 invokevirtual #5 // Invoke handler method: //Example.handleExc(LTestExc;)V
11 return // Return after handlingTestExc
Exception table: From To Target Type 0 4 5 ClassTestExc
try
block is compiled just as it would be if the try
were
not present:
If no exception is thrown during the execution of theMethodvoid
catchOne()
0 aload_0 // Beginning oftry
block 1 invokevirtual #4 // MethodExample.tryItOut()V
4 return // End oftry
block; normal return
try
block, it behaves as though
the try
were not there: tryItOut
is invoked and catchOne
returns.
Following the try
block is the Java virtual machine code that implements the single catch
clause:
The invocation of5 astore_1 // Store thrown value in local variable 1 6 aload_0 // Pushthis
7 aload_1 // Push thrown value 8 invokevirtual #5 // Invoke handler method: //Example.handleExc(LTestExc;)V
11 return // Return after handlingTestExc
Exception table: From To Target Type 0 4 5 ClassTestExc
handleExc
, the contents of the catch
clause, is also compiled
like a normal method invocation. However, the presence of a catch
clause causes
the compiler to generate an exception table entry. The exception table for the
catchOne
method has one entry corresponding to the one argument (an instance of
class TestExc
) that the catch
clause of catchOne
can handle. If some value that is
an instance of TestExc
is thrown during execution of the instructions between indices 0 and 4 in catchOne
, control is transferred to the Java virtual machine code at
index 5, which implements the block of the catch
clause. If the value that is thrown
is not an instance of TestExc
, the catch
clause of catchOne
cannot handle it.
Instead, the value is rethrown to the invoker of catchOne
.
A try
may have multiple catch
clauses:
Multiplevoid catchTwo() {
try {
tryItOut();
} catch (TestExc1 e) {
handleExc(e);
} catch (TestExc2 e) {
handleExc(e);
}
}
catch
clauses of a given try
statement are compiled by simply appending
the Java virtual machine code for each catch
clause one after the other and adding
entries to the exception table, as shown:
If during the execution of theMethodvoid catchTwo()
0 aload_0 // Begintry
block 1 invokevirtual #5 // MethodExample.tryItOut()V
4 return // End oftry
block; normal return 5 astore_1 // Beginning of handler forTestExc1
; // Store thrown value in local variable 1 6 aload_0 // Pushthis
7 aload_1 // Push thrown value 8 invokevirtual #7 // Invoke handler method: //Example.handleExc(LTestExc1;)V
11 return // Return after handlingTestExc1
12 astore_1 // Beginning of handler forTestExc2
; // Store thrown value in local variable 1 13 aload_0 // Pushthis
14 aload_1 // Push thrown value 15 invokevirtual #7 // Invoke handler method: //Example.handleExc(LTestExc2;)V
18 return // Return after handlingTestExc2
Exception table: From To Target Type 0 4 5 ClassTestExc1
0 4 12 ClassTestExc2
try
clause (between indices 0 and 4) a value is thrown
that matches the parameter of one or more of the catch
clauses (the value is an
instance of one or more of the parameters), the first (innermost) such catch
clause
is selected. Control is transferred to the Java virtual machine code for the block of
that catch
clause. If the value thrown does not match the parameter of any of the
catch
clauses of catchTwo
, the Java virtual machine rethrows the value without
invoking code in any catch
clause of catchTwo
.
Nested try
-catch
statements are compiled very much like a try
statement with multiple catch
clauses:
becomesvoid nestedCatch() {
try {
try {
tryItOut();
} catch (TestExc1 e) {
handleExc1(e);
}
} catch (TestExc2 e) {
handleExc2(e);
}
}
The nesting ofMethodvoid nestedCatch()
0 aload_0 // Begintry
block 1 invokevirtual #8 // MethodExample.tryItOut()V
4 return // End oftry
block; normal return 5 astore_1 // Beginning of handler forTestExc1
; // Store thrown value in local variable 1 6 aload_0 // Pushthis
7 aload_1 // Push thrown value 8 invokevirtual #7 // Invoke handler method: //Example.handleExc1(LTestExc1;)V
11 return // Return after handlingTestExc1
12 astore_1 // Beginning of handler forTestExc2
; // Store thrown value in local variable 1 13 aload_0 // Pushthis
14 aload_1 // Push thrown value 15 invokevirtual #6 // Invoke handler method: //Example.handleExc2(LTestExc2;)V
18 return // Return after handlingTestExc2
Exception table: From To Target Type 0 4 5 ClassTestExc1
0 12 12 ClassTestExc2
catch
clauses is represented only in the exception table. When an
exception is thrown, the first (innermost) catch clause that contains the site of the
exception and with a matching parameter is selected to handle it. For instance, if the
invocation of tryItOut
(at index 1) threw an instance of TestExc1
, it would be
handled by the catch
clause that invokes handleExc1
. This is so even though the
exception occurs within the bounds of the outer catch
clause (catching TestExc2
)
and even though that outer catch
clause might otherwise have been able to handle
the thrown value.
As a subtle point, note that the range of a catch
clause is inclusive on the "from" end and exclusive on the "to" end (§4.7.3). Thus, the exception table entry for the catch
clause catching TestExc1
does not cover the return instruction at offset 4. However, the exception table entry for the catch
clause catching TestExc2
does cover the return instruction at offset 11. Return instructions within nested catch
clauses are included in the range of instructions covered by nesting catch
clauses.
finally
try
-finally
statement is similar to that of try-catch
. Prior to
transferring control outside the try
statement, whether that transfer is normal or
abrupt, because an exception has been thrown, the finally
clause must first be executed.
For this simple example
the compiled code isvoid tryFinally() {
try {
tryItOut();
} finally {
wrapItUp();
}
}
There are four ways for control to pass outside of theMethodvoid tryFinally()
0 aload_0 // Beginning oftry
block 1 invokevirtual #6 // MethodExample.tryItOut()V
4 jsr 14 // Callfinally
block 7 return // End oftry
block 8 astore_1 // Beginning of handler for any throw 9 jsr 14 // Callfinally
block 12 aload_1 // Push thrown value 13 athrow // ...and rethrow the value to the invoker 14 astore_2 // Beginning offinally
block 15 aload_0 // Pushthis
16 invokevirtual #5 // MethodExample.wrapItUp()V
19 ret 2 // Return fromfinally
block Exception table: From To Target Type 0 4 8 any
try
statement: by falling
through the bottom of that block, by returning, by executing a break
or continue
statement, or by raising an exception. If tryItOut
returns without raising an exception,
control is transferred to the finally
block using a jsr instruction. The jsr 14
instruction at index 4 makes a "subroutine call" to the code for the finally
block at
index 14 (the finally
block is compiled as an embedded subroutine). When the
finally
block completes, the ret 2 instruction returns control to the instruction following
the jsr instruction at index 4.
In more detail, the subroutine call works as follows: The jsr instruction pushes the address of the following instruction (return at index 7) onto the operand stack before jumping. The astore_2 instruction that is the jump target stores the address on the operand stack into local variable 2. The code for the finally
block (in this case the aload_0 and invokevirtual instructions) is run. Assuming execution of that code completes normally, the ret instruction retrieves the address from local variable 2 and resumes execution at that address. The return instruction is executed, and tryFinally
returns normally.
A try
statement with a finally
clause is compiled to have a special exception handler, one that can handle any exception thrown within the try
statement. If tryItOut
throws an exception, the exception table for tryFinally
is searched for an appropriate exception handler. The special handler is found, causing execution to continue at index 8. The astore_1 instruction at index 8 stores the thrown value into local variable 1. The following jsr instruction does a subroutine call to the code for the finally
block. Assuming that code returns normally, the aload_1 instruction at index 12 pushes the thrown value back onto the operand stack, and the following athrow instruction rethrows the value.
Compiling a try
statement with both a catch
clause and a finally
clause is more complex:
becomesvoid tryCatchFinally() {
try {
tryItOut();
} catch (TestExc e) {
handleExc(e);
} finally {
wrapItUp();
}
}
If theMethodvoid
tryCatchFinally()
0 aload_0 // Beginning oftry
block 1 invokevirtual #4 // MethodExample.tryItOut()V
4 goto 16 // Jump tofinally
block 7 astore_3 // Beginning of handler forTestExc
; // Store thrown value in local variable 3 8 aload_0 // Pushthis
9 aload_3 // Push thrown value 10 invokevirtual #6 // Invoke handler method: //Example.handleExc(LTestExc;)V
13 goto 16 // Huh???1 16 jsr 26 // Callfinally
block 19 return // Return after handlingTestExc
20 astore_1 // Beginning of handler for exceptions // other thanTestExc
, or exceptions // thrown while handlingTestExc
21 jsr 26 // Callfinally
block 24 aload_1 // Push thrown value... 25 athrow // ...and rethrow the value to the invoker 26 astore_2 // Beginning offinally
block 27 aload_0 // Pushthis
28 invokevirtual #5 // MethodExample.wrapItUp()V
31 ret 2 // Return fromfinally
block Exception table: From To Target Type 0 4 7 ClassTestExc
0 16 20 any
try
statement completes normally, the goto instruction at index 4 jumps to the subroutine call for the finally
block at index 16. The finally
block at index 26 is executed, control returns to the return instruction at index 19, and tryCatchFinally
returns normally.
If tryItOut
throws an instance of TestExc
, the first (innermost) applicable exception handler in the exception table is chosen to handle the exception. The code for that exception handler, beginning at index 7, passes the thrown value to handleExc
and on its return makes the same subroutine call to the finally
block at index 26 as in the normal case. If an exception is not thrown by handleExc
, tryCatchFinally
returns normally.
If tryItOut
throws a value that is not an instance of TestExc
or if handleExc
itself throws an exception, the condition is handled by the second entry in the exception table, which handles any value thrown between indices 0 and 16. That exception handler transfers control to index 20, where the thrown value is first stored in local variable 1. The code for the finally
block at index 26 is called as a subroutine. If it returns, the thrown value is retrieved from local variable 1 and rethrown using the athrow instruction. If a new value is thrown during execution of the finally
clause, the finally
clause aborts, and tryCatchFinally
returns abruptly, throwing the new value to its invoker.
synchronized
method.
A synchronized
method is not normally implemented using monitorenter and monitorexit. Rather, it is simply distinguished in the runtime constant pool by the ACC_SYNCHRONIZED
flag, which is checked by the method invocation instructions. When invoking a method for which ACC_SYNCHRONIZED
is set, the current thread acquires a monitor, invokes the method itself, and releases the monitor whether the method invocation completes normally or abruptly. During the time the executing thread owns the monitor, no other thread may acquire it. If an exception is thrown during invocation of the synchronized
method and the synchronized
method does not handle the exception, the monitor for the method is automatically released before the exception is rethrown out of the synchronized
method.
The monitorenter and monitorexit instructions exist to support synchronized
statements. For example:
is compiled tovoid onlyMe(Foo f) {
synchronized(f) {
doSomething();
}
}
Methodvoid onlyMe(Foo)
0 aload_1 // Pushf
1 astore_2 // Store it in local variable 2 2 aload_2 // Push local variable 2 (f
) 3 monitorenter // Enter the monitor associated withf
4 aload_0 // Holding the monitor, passthis
and... 5 invokevirtual #5 // ...callExample.doSomething()V
8 aload_2 // Push local variable 2 (f
) 9 monitorexit // Exit the monitor associated withf
10 return // Return normally 11 aload_2 // In case of any throw, end up here 12 monitorexit // Be sure to exit monitor... 13 athrow // ...then rethrow the value to the invoker Exception table: From To Target Type 4 8 11 any
A full treatment of the compilation of nested classes and interfaces is outside the scope of this chapter. However, interested readers can refer to the Inner Classes Specification at http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.1/docs/guide/innerclasses/spec/innerclasses.doc.html
.
javac
compiler of Sun's JDK release 1.0.2.
Contents | Prev | Next | Index
The JavaTM Virtual Machine Specification
Copyright © 1999 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
All rights reserved
Please send any comments or corrections to [email protected]